Canary Insurance Group

From the Perch

Firm's policy or your own policy: how real estate brokers should think about E&O

By Cari Senefsky · May 2026 · 6 minute read

Most real estate brokers carry whatever E&O their firm carries, and most do not think about it again until a claim comes in. A practical look at when a firm's policy is doing its job for its agents, when it isn't, and what an individual policy actually adds on top.

When the firm program is doing its job, and when it isn't

A firm-wide real estate E&O policy is professional liability coverage the brokerage buys at the entity level, often with agents working under the firm's license picking up coverage as part of the arrangement. One policy, one renewal, one premium the firm carries. For a lot of brokerages, especially ones with a stable agent count and a fairly uniform book of transactions, that structure does what it needs to do. Keep in mind, this is not always the case, but we're speaking generally.

The named insured is the brokerage, not the individual agents. The limits are sized for the brokerage's overall exposure, not for any one agent's deal count or transaction profile. The deductible sits on the firm's balance sheet. The coverage decisions get made once a year by whoever renews the firm's program. If you are an agent under that policy, you are inheriting a set of choices someone else made.

Three reasons an individual policy earns its place beyond the firm program: it clearly lists the agent as the Insured; it can address transactions or property types the firm's limit or policy wording was not sized for; and it provides continuity across a move between firms when the timing of the alleged act and the policy in force at the time stop lining up neatly.

A claim scenario worth sitting with

Consider an agent who closes a $4.2 million commercial property transaction under a firm whose E&O aggregate is $1 million per claim and $2 million in the policy year. Six months later, a claim arrives alleging an inadequate disclosure on a known environmental condition. Two other claims have already eaten into the firm's aggregate for the year. By the time the agent's claim resolves, the firm's per-claim limit has been reached and the exposure above it sits on someone. The firm's coverage was sized for the firm, not an individual agent transaction.

Questions worth raising with whoever placed your firm or individual policy

  1. Who is named as an insured under the firm policy, and how does the form treat independent contractors versus employees of the firm?
  2. What is the per-claim limit and the aggregate, and how does the aggregate erode when more than one claim is open in the same policy year?
  3. If you left the firm tomorrow, what does the tail or extended reporting option actually look like, and who is entitled to elect it?
Your firm carries E&O because the firm is the party that gets named first in a suit. Whether the firm's coverage extends to you and a specific transaction is a different question entirely and one worth asking.
Cari Senefsky, Founder, Canary Insurance Group

How an insurance agent can help bring clarity

An insurance agent can help bring clarity to questions around the firm's policy structure and wording versus what an individual agent may need. Often times the firm's policy is fine for what you're doing. For the times it isn't, it's worth a conversation. The work is checking the fit: does the policy form actually treat your specific arrangement the way you think it does, are the limits sized for the work you are actually doing, and are the exclusions ones you can live with. These are similar questions other professional firms tend to face.

If you are in a brokerage where the E&O has been on autopilot, or you are independent and not sure your individual policy is doing what you need it to, that is the conversation Canary is built for. A real read of what your firm's program is doing, what it isn't, and whether anything sitting on top of it would earn its keep.

Let's Connect

Canary Insurance Group is licensed to place coverage in Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, North Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Texas. Articles on The Perch are written for general education. They do not constitute state-specific advice, legal advice, or placement of coverage. Coverage outcomes depend on your own policy form, your carrier, specific claim circumstances and applicable state law.